Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Academics, who speak scientific language, won't say "there's no antisemitism at UCLA" because we know that's not true.
Antisemitism is everywhere, the question is how limiting and dangerous is it. And how often is it encountered.
I grew up in the 1960s in a Queens neighborhood where antisemitism was a real thing. We were blamed for World War II. If it weren't for Jews my uncle Pete would still be alive. That was the story. No doubt the kids heard that at home, probably in much more vicious terms.
Antisemitism was bred into us at home, because of all the abuse my parents and grandparents, uncles and cousins, suffered in Europe, before coming the US during the war, their own idea of what it meant to be Jewish was not entirely positive. You can't help but feel responsible in some ways for the abuse you suffer. And you can't help but pass that on to your kids.
There was and is a fair amount of pain associated with being Jewish in the United States. Fact.
But: At UCLA? Harvard? Columbia? Please. That's such bullshit.
At the same time scientists can admit that there is antisemitism at these places we must also acknowledge that to single these institutions out among all, is complete utter total fucking bullshit.
That's a scientific appraisal, btw. Provable in peer-reviewed publications (though not submitted).
Antisemitism is complex. We should be hearing, openly, what exactly
Read more of this story at Slashdot.