Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
First, I love there's new interest in outlining software.
But there's too much lock-in in the developing systems.
This is everyone's business who wants to use these systems for collaboration. I like to use one editor, other people may like to use another. Key point: We should be able to collaborate even though we use different writing and organizing tools.
Same with the backends which can be used to provide beautiful tree visualizations, or networks, presentation slide shows, blogs. There are many different ways of rendering structures created by outliners. You should be able to innovate here without having to write your own outliner! It would be like having to use a different text editor just because you got a new printer. These things should work together. If we've learned one thing about tech over the decades it's that locking people in to using one vendor's tools stops growth. We should compete on the basis of price, performance and features, not lock-in. Users and devs should demand no lock-in. Long-term it means what holds promise now will devolve into a complete mess of things that don't work together.
There should be simple APIs to connect any outline editor with any back-end used for storage, graphic displays, data crunching.
I promise that all my editors and storage system will be connected through simple, open APIs. There will be no lock-in for users or devs.
I challenge anyone developing idea organizing software and back-ends to to the same.
Users and developers should demand it.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.