White House Supports Claim Putin Directed US Election Hack Slashdotby BeauHD on government at January 1, 1970, 1:00 am (cached at December 15, 2016, 11:35 pm)

The White House is suggesting that Russian President Vladimir Putin was directly involved in a hacking operation aimed at interfering with the U.S. presidential election. BBC reports: Ben Rhodes, adviser to President Barack Obama, said that Mr Putin maintains tight control on government operations, which suggests that he was aware. White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest added that it was "pretty obvious" that Mr Putin was involved. "Everything we know about how Russia operates and how Putin controls that government would suggest that, again, when you're talking about a significant cyber intrusion like this, we're talking about the highest levels of government," Mr Rhodes said. "And ultimately, Vladimir Putin is the official responsible for the actions of the Russian government." NBC reported that the U.S. had evidence that Mr Putin personally directed how information hacked by Russian intelligence was leaked. The Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence also released a statement asserting Russia had orchestrated the hack, including breaches on the Democratic National Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. The contents of those hacks, passed to Wikileaks and posted online, were embarrassing to the Democrats and shook up the presidential campaign. The NBC report, which cited two unnamed senior officials, said the hacking campaign began as a "vendetta" against Mrs Clinton before becoming "an effort to show corruption in American politics and split off key American allies." Mr Putin is said to have been furious when Mrs Clinton, as secretary of state, questioned the integrity of 2011 parliamentary elections in Russia. He publicly accused her of encouraging street protests.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

0-days hitting Fedora and Ubuntu open desktops to a world of hurt (ArsTechnica) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 11:30 pm)

How to delete or protect your Yahoo account (ZDNet) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 11:30 pm)

How to delete or protect your Yahoo account (ZDNet) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 11:30 pm)

How the DoD uses bug bounties to help secure the department's websites (TechRepublic SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 11:30 pm)

How the DoD uses bug bounties to help secure the department's websites (TechRepublic SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 11:30 pm)

0-days hitting Fedora and Ubuntu open desktops to a world of hurt (ArsTechnica) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 11:30 pm)

Greece's anti-austerity measures incur creditors' wrath AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)(cached at December 15, 2016, 11:00 pm)

First measures unveiled in over a year as pensioners take to Athens' streets to protest paltry planned handout.
Greece's anti-austerity measures incur creditors' wrath AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)(cached at December 15, 2016, 11:00 pm)

First measures unveiled in over a year as pensioners take to Athens' streets to protest paltry planned handout.
Businesses May No Longer Sue Customers Over Negative Reviews Slashdotby BeauHD on business at January 1, 1970, 1:00 am (cached at December 15, 2016, 10:34 pm)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Next Web: A few months I wrote about the Consumer Review Fairness Act. In a nutshell, this offers legal protections to consumers who leave negative reviews on sites like Yelp and TripAdvisor. You can now call out the restaurant who gave you food poisoning, or a bed-bug infested hotel without the risk of being dragged into a civil court. The long-overdue bill explicitly bans non-disparagement clauses in contracts between businesses and patrons. Over the years, there's been a rash of people getting sued after speaking their mind online. Today, President Obama signed off on the Consumer Review Fairness Act. It's now law. As great as this is for consumers, it's even better for the likes of TripAdvisor and Yelp, whose business model relies on people being able to speak their minds.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Businesses May No Longer Sue Customers Over Negative Reviews Slashdotby BeauHD on business at January 1, 1970, 1:00 am (cached at December 15, 2016, 10:34 pm)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Next Web: A few months I wrote about the Consumer Review Fairness Act. In a nutshell, this offers legal protections to consumers who leave negative reviews on sites like Yelp and TripAdvisor. You can now call out the restaurant who gave you food poisoning, or a bed-bug infested hotel without the risk of being dragged into a civil court. The long-overdue bill explicitly bans non-disparagement clauses in contracts between businesses and patrons. Over the years, there's been a rash of people getting sued after speaking their mind online. Today, President Obama signed off on the Consumer Review Fairness Act. It's now law. As great as this is for consumers, it's even better for the likes of TripAdvisor and Yelp, whose business model relies on people being able to speak their minds.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Almost 3,000 civilians evacuated from east Aleppo AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)(cached at December 15, 2016, 10:30 pm)

Some 40 buses and ambulances move civilians to Idlib province as evacuees bid emotional goodbye to war-torn city.
Cybersecurity Ghosts of Past, Present, and Future (SecurityWeek) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 10:30 pm)

Cybersecurity Ghosts of Past, Present, and Future (SecurityWeek) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 10:30 pm)

4 ways your company can avoid Yahoo-level stupidity in enterprise security (TechRepu SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at December 15, 2016, 10:30 pm)