Read more of this story at Slashdot.
A suggestion for Brian Stelter for tomorrow's Reliable Sources show.
Find a linguist to do a quick study of reporting on the Colorado Springs shooter compared with the reporting on the Paris shooters, and tell us about the differences, if any in the language we use for home-grown terrorism.
In his or her opinion, what if the Colorado Springs shooter had been dark-skinned, would the language have been different? If he had been African-American? An immigrant?
What if he had been Muslim?
How different would the reporting have been?
My theory based on my own non-expert opinion is that we are far more tolerant of white American Christian terrorists.
BTW, please don't recruit one Republican linguist and one Democratic linguist. It seems like this is more of a scientific question, one that can be answered, without the usual indecisiveness and lack of conclusion of much TV journalism.
What if in the future we thought of blogging as a literary form?
I was thinking -- we have writers retreats for people who write plays, for poets, maybe song-writers? Is online writing a dead-end (I don't think so) or will it be supported by traditions developed for other kinds of writing?
Read more of this story at Slashdot.