Fortsatt minskat gap mellan blocken SvD Inrikes(cached at September 8, 2014, 11:33 pm)

Ännu en opinionsmätning tyder på att gapet mellan blocken har minskat. I TV4/Novus senaste väljarbarometer skiljer 5,0 procentenheter - och närmandet kan till stor del tillskrivas Centern som rycker förbi Folkpartiet till att bli näst störst inom Alliansen.
Vuln: Django CVE-2014-0482 Authentication Bypass Vulnerability (SecurityFocus Vulner SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at September 8, 2014, 11:30 pm)

Project Management: Working Efficiently as a Team (IT Toolbox Blogs) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at September 8, 2014, 11:30 pm)

Is It Time To Split Linux Distros In Two? Slashdotby samzenpus on programming at January 1, 1970, 1:00 am (cached at September 8, 2014, 11:03 pm)

snydeq writes Desktop workloads and server workloads have different needs, and it's high time Linux consider a split to more adequately address them, writes Deep End's Paul Venezia. You can take a Linux installation of nearly any distribution and turn it into a server, then back into a workstation by installing and uninstalling various packages. The OS core remains the same, and the stability and performance will be roughly the same, assuming you tune they system along the way. Those two workloads are very different, however, and as computing power continues to increase, the workloads are diverging even more. Maybe it's time Linux is split in two. I suggested this possibility last week when discussing systemd (or that FreeBSD could see higher server adoption), but it's more than systemd coming into play here. It's from the bootloader all the way up. The more we see Linux distributions trying to offer chimera-like operating systems that can be a server or a desktop at a whim, the more we tend to see the dilution of both. You can run stock Debian Jessie on your laptop or on a 64-way server. Does it not make sense to concentrate all efforts on one or the other?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.








Is It Time To Split Linux Distros In Two? Slashdotby samzenpus on programming at January 1, 1970, 1:00 am (cached at September 8, 2014, 11:03 pm)

snydeq writes Desktop workloads and server workloads have different needs, and it's high time Linux consider a split to more adequately address them, writes Deep End's Paul Venezia. You can take a Linux installation of nearly any distribution and turn it into a server, then back into a workstation by installing and uninstalling various packages. The OS core remains the same, and the stability and performance will be roughly the same, assuming you tune they system along the way. Those two workloads are very different, however, and as computing power continues to increase, the workloads are diverging even more. Maybe it's time Linux is split in two. I suggested this possibility last week when discussing systemd (or that FreeBSD could see higher server adoption), but it's more than systemd coming into play here. It's from the bootloader all the way up. The more we see Linux distributions trying to offer chimera-like operating systems that can be a server or a desktop at a whim, the more we tend to see the dilution of both. You can run stock Debian Jessie on your laptop or on a 64-way server. Does it not make sense to concentrate all efforts on one or the other?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.








Scotland: Could the Kingdom still be united? AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)(cached at September 8, 2014, 11:00 pm)

As a "yes" vote looks a possibility, London is trying to turn the tide.
Scotland: Could the Kingdom still be united? AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)(cached at September 8, 2014, 11:00 pm)

As a "yes" vote looks a possibility, London is trying to turn the tide.
AU urges end to Ebola travel bans in W Africa AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)(cached at September 8, 2014, 11:00 pm)

African Union says travel restrictions to member states affected by Ebola virus is damaging the continent's economy.
AU urges end to Ebola travel bans in W Africa AL JAZEERA ENGLISH (AJE)(cached at September 8, 2014, 11:00 pm)

African Union says travel restrictions to member states affected by Ebola virus is damaging the continent's economy.
Ny Irakregering saknar ministrar SvD Utrikes(cached at September 8, 2014, 10:33 pm)

Premiärminister Haider al-Abadi lyckades slutligen bilda regering i Irak. Sent på måndagskvällen godkände parlamentet al-Abadis regering, men de tunga posterna som inrikes- och försvarsminister får vänta.
Ny Irakregering saknar ministrar SvD Utrikes(cached at September 8, 2014, 10:33 pm)

Premiärminister Haider al-Abadi lyckades slutligen bilda regering i Irak. Sent på måndagskvällen godkände parlamentet al-Abadis regering, men de tunga posterna som inrikes- och försvarsminister får vänta.
Intel Launches Xeon E5 V3 Series Server CPUs With Up To 18 Cores Slashdotby samzenpus on intel at January 1, 1970, 1:00 am (cached at September 8, 2014, 10:33 pm)

MojoKid writes Intel took the wraps off its Xeon E5 v3 server line-up today and the chip, based on Intel's Haswell-EP architecture, is looking impressive. Intel's previous generation Xeon E5 V2 chips, which were based on Ivy Bridge, topped out at 12 cores per socket. The new Xeon E5 v3 processors, in contrast, are going to push as high as 18 cores per socket — a 50% improvement. The TDP range is pushing slightly outwards in both directions; the E5 V2 family ranged from 50W to 150W, whereas the E5 V3 family will span 55W — 160W in a single workstation configuration. The core technologies Intel is introducing to the E5 V3 family pull from the Haswell architecture, including increased cache bandwidth, improved overall IPC, and new features like AVX2, which offers a theoretical near-doubling of floating point performance over the original AVX instructions. Full support for DDR4 DRAM memory is now included as well.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.








Intel Launches Xeon E5 V3 Series Server CPUs With Up To 18 Cores Slashdotby samzenpus on intel at January 1, 1970, 1:00 am (cached at September 8, 2014, 10:33 pm)

MojoKid writes Intel took the wraps off its Xeon E5 v3 server line-up today and the chip, based on Intel's Haswell-EP architecture, is looking impressive. Intel's previous generation Xeon E5 V2 chips, which were based on Ivy Bridge, topped out at 12 cores per socket. The new Xeon E5 v3 processors, in contrast, are going to push as high as 18 cores per socket — a 50% improvement. The TDP range is pushing slightly outwards in both directions; the E5 V2 family ranged from 50W to 150W, whereas the E5 V3 family will span 55W — 160W in a single workstation configuration. The core technologies Intel is introducing to the E5 V3 family pull from the Haswell architecture, including increased cache bandwidth, improved overall IPC, and new features like AVX2, which offers a theoretical near-doubling of floating point performance over the original AVX instructions. Full support for DDR4 DRAM memory is now included as well.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.








Blackbaud to Acquire MicroEdge (IT Toolbox Blogs) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at September 8, 2014, 10:30 pm)

Blackbaud to Acquire MicroEdge (IT Toolbox Blogs) SANS ISC SecNewsFeed(cached at September 8, 2014, 10:30 pm)